SCTSPRINT3

Tuesday 2nd July 2024

 

Issue No. 197

 

 

C O N T E N T S

 

 

Notices
Fixing Notice
Calling List
Notice
Outer House Rolls
Inner House Rolls

 


 

N O T I C E

 

 

Parties should liaise with the Keeper’s office prior to enrolling a motion seeking to assign or re-assign a date for a hearing in the Outer House (this excludes commercial and family actions).

 

Please can parties communicate with the Keeper’s office inbox:  keepers@scotcourts.gov.uk

 

This change is being implemented to avoid overloading of the court rolls, and to avoid hearings in actions which are not being case managed, being assigned for unsuitable dates and times.

 

 

 

UPDATED N O T I C E

 

 

OPPOSED AND STARRED MOTIONS

 

The procedure for the allocation of opposed and starred motions will now be as follows:

 

When an opposition to a motion or an automatic starred motion is lodged during term time, the Keeper’s Office will allocate the motion to call 2 days ahead from the enrolment of the opposed or starred motion.

 

Can all parties please ensure their respective counsel are available prior to the enrolment of any opposed or starred motion.

 

Parties should liaise with the Keeper’s office in relation to the allocation of these motions.  Following the allocation of the motion, the clerk will liaise with parties to agree the time the motion will call.  This is to ensure an opportunity is provided for representations to be made about the format of the hearing.

 

All communications with the Keeper’s Office should be made to:

keepers@scotcourts.gov.uk

 

 

 

______________


 

FIXING N O T I C E

 

 

The Keeper’s office is currently fixing the following for Personal Injury Proofs and Ordinary Action Proofs:

 

Personal Injury 4 day Proofs – 18th February 2025

Personal Injury Proofs requiring more than 4 days – 1st July 2025

Ordinary Action Proofs requiring more than 4 days – 8th October 2024

 

 

 

_______________


 

COURT OF SESSION

 

 

CALLING LIST

 

Tuesday 2nd July

 

1 COS-PD270/24 Alexander Glasgow v Calvin Leslie &c Lyons Davidson Scotland LLP
 
2 COS-A170/24 Chu Hui &c v Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board
 
Jones Whyte
3 COS-PD273/24 Dillon Crawford v Cruden Holdings Ltd
 
Thompsons
4 COS-PD280/24 Elizabeth Whitelaw v A1 Minibus and Coach Services Ltd
 
Digby Brown LLP
5 COS-PD271/24 Jean Finnigan v The Congregation of the Sisters of Nazareth
 
Digby Brown LLP
6 COS-PD266/24 Joseph Houston v Stuart Coaches Ltd
 
Digby Brown LLP
7 COS-PD257/24 Maged Beshay v Lothian Health Board &c
 
Drummond Miller LLP
8 COS-PD279/24 Richard Allan v Bullet Express Ltd
 
Digby Brown LLP
 
9 COS-PD209/24 William Ferguson &c v National Grid Plc
 
Digby Brown LLP
10 COS-A164/24 Yuko Furuichi v Stephen Zirger Brodies LLP

 

 

 

_______________


 

N O T I C E

 

 

INNER HOUSE

 

All substantive business in the Inner House i.e. hearings not dealing with procedural business as defined by Rule 37A.1(2) of the Court of Session Rules will be conducted in person, however the court may allow parties to be heard remotely on cause shown.  A party seeking a remote, or hybrid, hearing should apply to do so by motion.

 

Procedural hearings in the Inner House, such as leave/permission to proceed hearings, will be conducted virtually or dealt with on the basis of written submissions, however the court may allow the hearing or part thereof to be conducted in person “on cause shown”.  A party seeking an in person or hybrid procedural hearing should apply to do so by motion.

 

 

 

OUTER HOUSE

 

All first instance hearings in the Outer House including proofs, debates and judicial review hearings will be conducted in-person, however the court may allow parties or their witnesses to be heard remotely on cause shown.  A party seeking a remote, or hybrid, hearing should apply to do so by motion.

 

Procedural hearings in the Outer House, including applications for permission to proceed in judicial review petitions, and preliminary and procedural hearings in the Commercial court, will be conducted using Webex or dealt with on the basis of written submissions, however the court may allow the hearing or part thereof to be conducted in person “on cause shown”.  A party seeking an in person or hybrid procedural hearing should apply to do so by motion.

 

 

 

_______________


 

OUTER HOUSE ROLLS

 

 

LORD BRAID – D Allen, Clerk

 

Court 6 - Parliament House

 

Thursday 4th July

 

Procedural Hearing

between 9.00am and 9.30am

 

COS-CA7/24 Barry Stewart &c as joint liquidators of One Call Holdings Ltd v Mario Formisano BBM Solicitors Ltd Harper MacLeod LLP  

 

Continued Procedural Hearing

between 9.30am and 10.00am

 

COS-CA26/24 Aberdeenshire Council v FMP Joint Venture Ltd Brodies LLP CMS  

 

 

 

LORD STUART – N Marchant, Clerk

 

Court 4 - Parliament House

 

Thursday 4th July

 

In terms of Rule of Court 49, a Proof has been allowed in the following action:

 

COS-F54/22 Gerard Sutton v Heather Sutton Wright Johnston & MacKenzie LLP Balfour + Manson LLP  

 

Continued By Order

at 9.30am

 

COS-AD2/24 Application for Authority to Adopt under the Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007 re:  RM Wright Johnston & MacKenzie LLP    

 

By Order

 

COS-F52/23 Aileen Curle v Gareth Curle Brodies LLP BTO Solicitors LLP  

 

 

 

TO BE ALLOCATED

 

Thursday 4th July

 

By Order

In terms of Rule of Court 43.6(3)

 

COS-PD362/22 Jamie-Leigh O’Neill v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Ltd Friends Legal DWF LLP  

 

By Order

In terms of Rule of Court 43.6(3)

 

COS-PD382/23 Deirdre Brogan &c v Crudens (Milton Keynes) Ltd &c Digby Brown LLP Clyde & Co (Scotland) LLP  

 

By Order

 

COS-PD401/23 Gordon Nixon v Hermes Parcelnet Ltd Digby Brown LLP Clyde & Co (Scotland) LLP  

 

Starred Motion

 

COS-PD292/23 Joanne Nicolson &c v Henry Berg Digby Brown LLP BTO Solicitors LLP  

 

Starred Motion

 

COS-PD476/22 TBH v City of Edinburgh Council Thompsons Clyde & Co (Scotland) LLP  

 

 

 

_______________


 

INNER HOUSE ROLLS

 

 

FIRST DIVISION

 

Thursday 4th July

 

Summar Roll

 

A214/20 Reclaiming Motion (Lord Stuart) William Gray v Stuart McCallion &c Harper MacLeod LLP Brodies LLP  

 

 

 

_______________