We use cookies to collect anonymous data to help us improve your site browsing experience.

Click 'Accept all cookies' to agree to all cookies that collect anonymous data. To only allow the cookies that make the site work, click 'Use essential cookies only.' Visit 'Set cookie preferences' to control specific cookies.

Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Search

What can we help you with today?

Skip to main

Case: HCA/2025/449/XC

JH v HM Advocate

Livestreaming of the Criminal Appeal Court

Notice to viewers

References may be made to sexual offences, violence, or other sensitive matters. Some viewers may find the content distressing.

Where necessary, certain information may be restricted to protect the identity of complainers and witnesses.

Restrictions

Hearings are livestreamed as part of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service’s support for open justice.

Please note that recording, storing or broadcasting the proceedings is only possible if permitted under the law on fair dealing or if authorised by the Lord President under the Judicial Office for Scotland Broadcast Protocol.

Any unauthorised capture, re-use, re-editing or redistribution of the material could attract liability for breach of copyright, in addition to the possibility of contempt of court proceedings.

information icon

Playback unavailable: To safeguard the identity of vulnerable individuals, playback of this content is not available. Thank you for your understanding.

About this case

Case name

JH v HM Advocate

Case reference

HCA/2025/449/XC

Type of appeal

Appeal against Conviction

Date of hearing

Thursday 28 May 2026

Time of hearing

10:30 until conclusion

Judges

  • Lord Justice Clerk
  • Lord Matthews
  • Lord Armstrong

Counsel for the Appellant (JH)

Ann Ogg, Solicitor Advocate

Case description

[1]    The appellant was convicted by a jury at the High Court of Justiciary at Edinburgh of rape and, separately, sexual assault of a young child by penetration. The complainers were aged 12 and 13, while the appellant was aged 15 at the time of the offending. The trial judge imposed an extended sentence comprising a custodial term of 5 years and an extension period of 3 years together with a Non-Harassment Order in respect of each complainer for a period of 25 years.

[2]    The appellant challenges his conviction on the ground that the preliminary hearing judge erred by refusing to admit adminicles of evidence under section 275 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 which he maintains would have supported his defence. In particular, he argues that evidence of messages passing between himself and the complainers demonstrative of a prior agreement to meet for sexual activity ought to have been admitted in evidence for the purposes of challenging the complainers’ credibility and to support his defence of consent insofar as it applied to the complainer aged 13.

[3]    The High Court of Justiciary Appeal Court will hear the appeal on Thursday 27 May 2026 at 10:30am.