We use cookies to collect anonymous data to help us improve your site browsing experience.

Click 'Accept all cookies' to agree to all cookies that collect anonymous data. To only allow the cookies that make the site work, click 'Use essential cookies only.' Visit 'Set cookie preferences' to control specific cookies.

Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Search

What can we help you with today?

Skip to main

Case: HCA/2025/577/XC

HM Advocate v CM

Livestreaming of the Criminal Appeal Court

Notice to viewers

References may be made to sexual offences, violence, or other sensitive matters. Some viewers may find the content distressing.

Where necessary, certain information may be restricted to protect the identity of complainers and witnesses.

Restrictions

Hearings are livestreamed as part of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service’s support for open justice.

Please note that recording, storing or broadcasting the proceedings is only possible if permitted under the law on fair dealing or if authorised by the Lord President under the Judicial Office for Scotland Broadcast Protocol.

Any unauthorised capture, re-use, re-editing or redistribution of the material could attract liability for breach of copyright, in addition to the possibility of contempt of court proceedings.

Watch previous livestream hearing

HM Advocate v CM

Case: HCA/2025/577/XC

Friday, 16 January 2026

10:30 until conclusion

Welcome. Hearings are livestreamed as part of the SCTS's support of open justice.

This is an archive of a livestream. Find out about restrictions on livestreaming.

About this case

Case name

HM Advocate v CM

Case reference

HCA/2025/577/XC

Type of appeal

Crown Appeal against Sentence

Date of hearing

Friday 16 January 2026

Time of hearing

10:30 until conclusion

Judges

  • Lord Justice Clerk
  • Lord Matthews
  • Lord Armstrong

Counsel for the Respondent (CM)

Fred Mackintosh, KC

Case description

[1]    On 21 August 2025 the respondent was convicted by a jury at Perth Sheriff Court of four charges including assault, sexual assault and the use of lewd, indecent and libidinous practices towards a young child.

[2]    On 2 October 2025, the respondent was sentenced to a total period of 40 months imprisonment. Additionally, a Non-Harassment Order was imposed in favour of each of the complainers for a period of 10 years.

[3]    The Crown appeals on the grounds of undue leniency. They argue that the sheriff erred in her assessment of the seriousness of the offending, that a more severe sentence was necessary and that a Sexual Harm Prevention Order was appropriate in the circumstances.

[4]    The appeal will be heard by the High Court of Justiciary Appeal Court on Friday 16 January 2026 at 10:30am.