We use cookies to collect anonymous data to help us improve your site browsing experience.

Click 'Accept all cookies' to agree to all cookies that collect anonymous data. To only allow the cookies that make the site work, click 'Use essential cookies only.' Visit 'Set cookie preferences' to control specific cookies.

Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Search

What can we help you with today?

Skip to main

Case: HCA/2025/318/XC

David Cuthill v HM Advocate

Livestreaming of the Criminal Appeal Court

Notice to viewers

References may be made to sexual offences, violence, or other sensitive matters. Some viewers may find the content distressing.

Where necessary, certain information may be restricted to protect the identity of complainers and witnesses.

Restrictions

Hearings are livestreamed as part of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service’s support for open justice.

Please note that recording, storing or broadcasting the proceedings is only possible if permitted under the law on fair dealing or if authorised by the Lord President under the Judicial Office for Scotland Broadcast Protocol.

Any unauthorised capture, re-use, re-editing or redistribution of the material could attract liability for breach of copyright, in addition to the possibility of contempt of court proceedings.

Watch previous livestream hearing

David Cuthill v HM Advocate

Case: HCA/2025/318/XC

Thursday, 12 February 2026

10:30 until conclusion

Welcome. Hearings are livestreamed as part of the SCTS's support of open justice.

This is an archive of a livestream. Find out about restrictions on livestreaming.

About this case

Case name

David Cuthill v HM Advocate

Case reference

HCA/2025/318/XC

Type of appeal

Appeal against conviction 

Date of hearing

Thursday 12 February 2026

Time of hearing

10:30 until conclusion

Judges

  • Lord Justice Clerk
  • Lord Matthews
  • Lord Clark

Counsel for the Appellant (DC)

Darren Cox

Case description

[1]    The appellant was convicted by a jury at Dunfermline Sheriff Court of a charge of having with him in prison an article which had a blade or a sharp point. He was sentenced to imprisonment for 8 months. He appeals against conviction on two grounds. He argues, first, that the sheriff misdirected the jury when she directed them not only about articles with a sharp point or a blade but also about offensive weapons. Second, he argues that the sheriff further misdirected the jury when directing them about the meaning of the appellant having an article “with him.”

[2]    The High Court of Justiciary Appeal Court will hear the appeal on Thursday 12 February 2026 at 10:30am.