SCTSPRINT3

Wednesday 18th May 2022

 

Issue No. 164

 

 

C O N T E N T S

 

 

 
 
Notice
Fixing Notice
Calling List
Walling List
Notice
Outer House Rolls

 


 

N O T I C E

 

 

OPPOSED AND STARRED MOTIONS

 

The procedure for the allocation of opposed and starred motions will now be as follows:

 

When an opposition to a motion or an automatic starred motion is lodged during term time, the Keeper’s Office will allocate a date for the motion to call a minimum of 2 days aheadCan all parties please ensure their respective counsel are available prior to the enrolment of any opposed or starred motion.

 

An email will be sent to parties setting out the proposed date, Judge and clerk.  The clerk will then liaise with parties to agree a time for the motion to call.  This is to ensure opportunity is provided for representations to be made about the form of the hearing.

 

 

 

_________________

 

 

 

FIXING N O T I C E

 

 

The Keeper’s office is currently fixing the following for Personal Injury Proofs and Ordinary Action Proofs:

 

Personal Injury 4 day Proofs - 20th December 2022

Personal Injury Proofs requiring more than 4 days - 7th March 2023

Ordinary Action Proofs requiring more than 4 days - 12th July 2022

 

 

 

_________________

 

 


 

COURT OF SESSION

 

 

CALLING LIST

 

Wednesday 18th May

 

1 COS/PD164-22 David Cowan &c v Clifford DaviesDigby Brown LLP
2 COS/PD179-22 Deborah Thorley v Enhance Healthcare LtdDigby Brown LLP
3 COS/PD175-22 Marion Bushnell &c v Tata Steel UK LtdThompsons

 

 

_________________

 

 

 

COURT OF SESSION

 

 

WALLING LIST

 

Wednesday 18th May

 

1 Petition Jacobite Cruises Ltd orders under section 1096 of the Companies Act 2006Harper Macleod LLP
2 Note Samuel Kane for leave to raise an action against Upper Clyde Shipbuilders Limited (in liq)Thompsons
3 Petition Brian Smith to restore Lion Foundry Company Ltd to the register of companiesDigby Brown LLP
4 Petition Francis Brennan to restore William Pontin Ltd to the register of companiesDigby Brown LLP
5 Petition Samuel James Woodward and Colin Peter Dempster for an order under paragraph 76 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986DLA Piper Scotland LLP
6 Petition The Nursing and Midwifery Council for an extension of the period of an Interim Conditions of Practice Order imposed on a Registrant under Article 31(9) of the Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001 by 12 months to 5 July 2023N/A

 

 

_________________

 

 

 

N O T I C E

 

 

INNER HOUSE

 

All substantive business in the Inner House i.e. hearings not dealing with procedural business as defined by Rule 37A.1(2) of the Court of Session Rules will be conducted in person, however the court may allow parties to be heard remotely on cause shown. A party seeking a remote, or hybrid, hearing should apply to do so by motion.

 

Procedural hearings in the Inner House, such as leave/permission to proceed hearings, will be conducted virtually or dealt with on the basis of written submissions, however the court may allow the hearing or part thereof to be conducted in person “on cause shown”. A party seeking an in person or hybrid procedural hearing should apply to do so by motion.

 

 

OUTER HOUSE

 

All first instance hearings in the Outer House including proofs, debates and judicial review hearings will be conducted in-person, however the court may allow parties or their witnesses to be heard remotely on cause shown. A party seeking a remote, or hybrid, hearing should apply to do so by motion.

 

Procedural hearings in the Outer House, including applications for permission to proceed in judicial review petitions, and preliminary and procedural hearings in the Commercial court, will be conducted using Webex or dealt with on the basis of written submissions, however the court may allow the hearing or part thereof to be conducted in person “on cause shown”. A party seeking an in person or hybrid procedural hearing should apply to do so by motion.

 

 

 

_________________

 

 

 

OUTER HOUSE ROLLS

 

 

LADY WISE – H Groves, Clerk

 

Court 4 – Parliament House

 

Friday 20th May

 

Starred Motion

at 9.30am

 

A76/15 Sarah Duncan v Grampian Health Board Balfour + Manson LLPNHS Scotland Central Legal Office 

 


 

LORD BRAILSFORD – N Marchant, Clerk

 

Court 12 – Parliament House

 

Friday 20th May

 

Starred Motion

 

A25/22 James Watt v Emili Ziem Gillespie MacAndrew LLPStewart Legal  

 

 

LORD ERICHT – D Facchini, Clerk

 

Court 8 – Parliament House

 

Friday 20th May

 

By Order

between 9.00am and 10.00am

 

CA109/21 Christopher Frizell v Martin Aitken Financial Services Ltd Stronachs LLPDWF LLP  

Substantive Hearing

 

P748/21 Pet:  Victoria Reid for Judicial Review Drummond Miller LLPSGLD  

 


 

LADY CARMICHAEL– A Harkins, Clerk

 

Court 5 – Parliament House

 

Friday 20th May

 

Case Management Hearing

at 9.00am

 

F26/22 Benedicte Duban v Edouard Duban DAC Beachcroft Scotland LLPBurness Paull LLP  

 

 

LORD HARROWER – S Alexander, Clerk

 

Court 6 – Parliament House

 

Friday 20th May

 

Preliminary Hearing

between 9.00am and 9.30am

 

CA33/22 James Barnett &c v Genoyer SAS CMS MacRoberts LLP 

By Order

between 9.30am and 10.00am

 

CA79/20 Argyll and Bute Council v Keith Punler &cBrodies LLP    

 


 

LORD BRAID – L Miller, Clerk

 

Court 10 – Parliament House

 

Friday 20th May

 

Procedural Hearing

between 9.30am and 10.00am

 

CA12/22 Arnold Clark Automobiles Ltd v Keyline Civil Specialists Ltd DAC Beachcroft Scotland LLPDWF LLP  

Substantive Hearing

 

P117/20 Pet:  Neil Robertson for Judicial Review Drummond Miller LLPSGLD 

 

 

TO BE ALLOCATED

 

Friday 20th May

 

By Order

In terms of Rule of Court 43.6(3)

 

COS/PD132-21 Hugh Anderson v Turner Property Services Ltd DAC Beachcroft Scotland LLPKennedys Scotland 

By Order

 

A309/18 The Scottish Ministers v MacTaggart & Mickel Homes Ltd Clyde & Co (Scotland) LLP DAC Beachcroft Scotland LLP 

By Order

 

PD489/18 Wendy Fisher &c v Hugh M Fulton Ltd &c Thompsons Clyde & Co (Scotland) LLPBTO Solicitors LLP

By Order

 

PD180/19 William McLean v United Kingdom Atomic Energy AuthorityThompsons Harper MacLeod LLP 

 

 

_________________